Page 4 of 5
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:12 pm
by Trying2Hard
iamcool wrote:ravensgrace wrote:iamcool wrote:
i know
So, why did you post it, again? You weren't actually posting in response to anyone.
i was bored and wanted to get my post count up ... problem?
Mmm. Yes. Quite. It's annoying when people repost things others have said before. Especially stupid jokes. It was funny for a few seconds though. ^_^
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:21 pm
by Xeniph
OMGOSHBREEISNOTLDSORMORMONURALLFREAKSFORTHINKING
THATGETOFTHEBACKOFMYRELIGIONIJUSTSAWTHISONHEREAND
THOUGHTIDTOTALLYFREAKOUTCUZAPPARANTLYMYRELIGIONIS
UNDERATTACKTHATSNEVERHAPPENEDBEFOREINTHEHISTORYOF
THEUNIVERSESOIMGONNAPOSTHEREANDRANTABOUTITMKAY?
Just thought I'd...well...not really sure what the heck that was...
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:08 am
by AutoPilate
Xeniph wrote:OMGOSHBREEISNOTLDSORMORMONURALLFREAKSFORTHINKING
THATGETOFTHEBACKOFMYRELIGIONIJUSTSAWTHISONHEREAND
THOUGHTIDTOTALLYFREAKOUTCUZAPPARANTLYMYRELIGIONIS
UNDERATTACKTHATSNEVERHAPPENEDBEFOREINTHEHISTORYOF
THEUNIVERSESOIMGONNAPOSTHEREANDRANTABOUTITMKAY?
Just thought I'd...well...not really sure what the heck that was...
Lay off the dope, son.
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:14 am
by Xeniph
AutoPilate wrote:Xeniph wrote:OMGOSHBREEISNOTLDSORMORMONURALLFREAKSFORTHINKING
THATGETOFTHEBACKOFMYRELIGIONIJUSTSAWTHISONHEREAND
THOUGHTIDTOTALLYFREAKOUTCUZAPPARANTLYMYRELIGIONIS
UNDERATTACKTHATSNEVERHAPPENEDBEFOREINTHEHISTORYOF
THEUNIVERSESOIMGONNAPOSTHEREANDRANTABOUTITMKAY?
Just thought I'd...well...not really sure what the heck that was...
Lay off the dope, son.
Hee hee...XP
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:00 pm
by nobackspacebutton
AutoPilate wrote:Xeniph wrote:OMGOSHBREEISNOTLDSORMORMONURALLFREAKSFORTHINKING
THATGETOFTHEBACKOFMYRELIGIONIJUSTSAWTHISONHEREAND
THOUGHTIDTOTALLYFREAKOUTCUZAPPARANTLYMYRELIGIONIS
UNDERATTACKTHATSNEVERHAPPENEDBEFOREINTHEHISTORYOF
THEUNIVERSESOIMGONNAPOSTHEREANDRANTABOUTITMKAY?
Just thought I'd...well...not really sure what the heck that was...
Lay off the dope, son.
Seriously. O_O
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:47 pm
by Kasdeja
Wait...so...Bree is NOT LDS?
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:51 pm
by AutoPilate
Let yo' SOOOOOUL GLOOOO!
Let it shine through!
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:57 pm
by Kasdeja
Sexual Chocolate!
SEXUAL CHOCOLATE!
drops microphone and walks away
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:35 am
by apocalypse46
she is probably islam
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:19 am
by twelfthofnever
LDS? Hmm. Needs more Jell-O.
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:55 am
by Kasdeja
Careful, it's tainted!
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:50 am
by yarvin
Absynth wrote:wow. misguided much... how many mormons do you know who have an altar to Crowley in their room and freak out when someone tries to light the ceremonial altar candles??
you must know some of them crazy, thelemic, robe wearin, ofshoot branch of mormons. because thats no mormon i know.
No, but some of the more, um, *passionate* ones keep plenty of Joseph Smith memorabilia around and freak out when someone tries to drink a Coke.
Re: OMG STOP THINKING BREE IS LDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:03 am
by yarvin
bethy wrote:It's a whole lot simpler than that.
Bree isn't Christian. That excludes Mormons, too. End of story.
Yes...there are many misinformed people who say Mormons aren't Christians. But, that's simply not the case.
Correct. Mormons are heterodox (unorthodox) Christians, and only moderately heterodox at that. More toward the orthodox end we have the Seventh-Day Adventists, who are now widely accepted, and more toward the heretical end, the Jehovah's Witnesses and - my personal favorites - the Unitarians (UU Christians and Spongites) and Unity.
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:40 pm
by bethy
Actually, they see themselves as more "orthodox" than one would think. Although, I mean "orthodox" in the strict sense of the word.
Mormons have a totally different take on the foundation of Christianity, and really can't be compared to the modern, more widely accepted version. They don't see themseleves as a break off of any particular Christian church...but they follow the original as Christ set it up when he was alive. They believe the authority was taken away because of apostasy, and later restored. There's a big misconception, though, that they believe there was a total apostasy. That's not true....their position was that the Priesthood Authority...the authority to act on God's behalf was removed, and while the Catholics claim to have had an unbroken apostolic histsory...it's not the same.
They believe that one can lose the authority simply through immoral behavior, and while some people were still "going through the motions" as it were, they didn't have the full ahtority. It also doesn't mean there weren't good, decent Christaians in the world either. That's why, they say, the ancient Church had so many struggles and oft changed history in it's favor....becuase they didn't have the full divine guidance.
So, they call themselves the "restored church" and it's based on the Church Christ set up....and not what some of the Apostles did after his death.
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:27 pm
by Incognito
no, she could be some form of older mormonism. when mormonism first came about, they were trying to make their own language, and actually had a lot of ties to old egypt type ceremonies. and also, there are break-offs from the LDS church (FLDS etc) that are a lot more fundamentalist crazy.
there's also some ties between mormonism and free masonry.
so Bree could be some form of mormonism.
(i live in UT among the mormons with mormon family, i know about this stuff)